96 Comments
User's avatar
Anna Maria Chmielewski's avatar

The mirror metaphor is especially powerful. It reveals the deep illusion of the ego — how it clings to reflection, mistaking one's inverted image for their essence. The mirror only shows what the body rejects; so too, ego defines us by what we are not. In a world driven by mechanistic ideals — where life is reduced to function and flaws are treated as errors to be erased — this inverted logic becomes normalized. But as Huxley saw, what appears worthless in the world of appearances is often most vital in the deeper reality. Flaws, lack, and imperfection are not failures of humanity; they are its very essence. To impose clinical logic on life’s creation is to reject the soul for the fragile shell — to dehumanize in pursuit of the inhuman ideal. But it is precisely in our lack that love is born, and through our limits that we become capable of the deeper meaning of love and life itself.

Zbigniew's avatar

Brilliant! Thank you.

Now... please. Anything good, beautiful, constructive. Not negative. Just once for once?

Bifurcatio's avatar

It truly is amazing how, if you can get a person to accept a single premise, you can add all sorts of warped, twisted, corrupted, and perverted logic to entrap, ensnare, and enslave him for the rest of his life. Take the scribblings of a random Jew several millennia ago, "You were born in sin, and you need salvation. If you don't accept this salvation, you will burn in Hell in excruciating agony for all Eternity!" Tell this egregious lie to a child, he accepts it, and you've entrapped, ensnared, and enslaved him for the rest of his life. He grows older, tells this same lie to his children, and after a couple of millennia, you've got the whole Western civilization entrapped, ensnared, and enslaved. They are now all putty in your hands and you can guide them like Zombies to do your will, as is happening today.

Bifurcatio's avatar

"Stalin and Hitler both knew: it’s about ruthlessly imposing your logic." The difference between Stalin and Hitler is that Stalin was fighting to create the Jewish communist world we find ourselves in today. Hitler and the Germans fought to the death for Western Nature based values, ways, traditions and heritage. With the help of our American ZOG, Stalin won WWII for the Jews, and we have their boots in our faces today. Not yet as bad as the poor Palestinians in Gaza do, but it's coming. Karl Marx didn't even really have to write his Communist Manifesto, as it's all out front and center in that Magnum Opus of Middle Eastern psychopathy, the Abrahamic/Jewish Holy Bible. It befuddles me to discombobulation that so very few see how tyrannical and communist that Wholly Black Book is.

Lee Harding's avatar

Great work as always.

richard cunningham's avatar

Very helpful read. Articulates that flawed logic in the wrong hands (arrogant academics) can lead to disastrous results.

In my community over a thousand health care workers fired for vaccine hesitancy in 2021 in spite of having been exposed for over a year to Covid using the false logic that vaccination would stop the spread. A complete denial of natural immunity.

30below's avatar

I wouldn’t want any sperm from someone who got the jab or any other useless vaccines.

voza0db's avatar

We just need to wait a little more...

Soon all the problems related to reproduction will cease to exist.

The Natural Evolution

https://voza0db.substack.com/p/morons-just-dont-get-it-2e3

Be patient. We'll make it work.

VictorDianne Watson's avatar

It’s hard to even imagine this scenario. A child created because of love between a man and a woman is most desired because that love is expressed by the existence of the child.

zirrus's avatar

Couple quick points. Biology already has exquisite ways to allow the strongest sperm to get the gold - the thought that we can do better without wreaking havok is pure hubris.

Also, loved the comments about the flaws in humans sometimes being their most endearing elements, in a very spiritual sense. Like the indigenous basket weavers or pottery creaters who purposefully leave a stitch off, or allow a line break, declaring, "we do this because that's where the God comes in".

I guess I also have to add that I haven't known a family who had a member of their family with Down Syndrome who didn't feel their lives were made better by the beautiful souls they were - even accounting for any of the difficulties the family faced in the process

J in veritatis inquisitione's avatar

Thank you for this profound essay, as other readers pointed out. My comment:

Under the guise of the desire for a perfectly healthy baby, isn't this pure eugenics? Candidates with undesirable genes are to be eliminated. But who decides what is undesirable?

Isn't it eugenics the project of this "non-elite", supported by all the little demons of this world, for whom the populace is mainly made up of parasitic cockroaches to be eliminated.

They are people who have made the choice to love themselves, to love their own Self, in contempt of the other. I think that it is the lack of love for the Other that is the disease of our time.

Atao's avatar

By the way Joe Dispenza is on his way to make epigenetics mainstream. Genetic conditions can be changed once we have access to the quantum field, which allows for new choices, beyond any probability.

Stephan Lemmens's avatar

Everything that is scarce is costly, a 5$ horse is rare, it is therefore costly…

Atao's avatar

You should really reconsider your terminology. The way you use the words rational and logic leads to a lot of misunderstanding. There is nothing rational or logic in the way these people act, who want to force vaccines or in-vitro reproduction on us. Their argumentation isn't rational either. It's pseudo-rational, it's fake rationality disguising the commercial or totalitarian intentions underneath. There is absolutely nothing wrong with rationality or logic by itself. They are very fine tools, if we use them appropriately and in the appropriate context. As with the hammer, which we'd better use for nails and not for screws (or to win the debate with our neighbour), with rationality and logic it's the same. In many instances, love or intuition or instinct or even reflex is the better answer in a given life situation. All depends on the context and the goals to achieve. It's even possible that we need to learn to use several of these faculties in conjunction, in order to get the best outcomes. In this context I suggest you also to have a look at the work of Clare W. Graves and Ken Wilber who worked on the evolution of consciousness from pre-rational to rational to trans-rational.

Joe Bruno's avatar

Somehow you missed Desmet's point. And you have a lot of balls starting off telling him how to express his ideas (reconsider his terminology).

Your grammar is poor, your style pompous and, lastly, you do not understand the meaning of the word logic.

Atao's avatar

Can you be a little bit more specific Mr. Super Teacher? In which way did I miss Desmet's point? What's the real meaning of the word logic, Master? And I'm really sorry for my pompous style. I hope I didn't offend you personally! Will I still have the right to write in English although it's not my first language?

neva's avatar

If we don't want a dystopian future we'll have to embody love. It takes work and time and it starts with raising our frequency.

yantra's avatar

And then what about frozen embryos? even if both egg and sperm are "harvested" from a loving couple (who may want to ensure their ability to reproduce a few years hence) - the gametes are combined in a lab to create embryos, then frozen. i know a couple who did this a year or two ago and are now beginning the process of embryo implantation into the woman. they were asked why not just do it naturally now - but the response was that since these embryos have been genetically tested, they are much more likely to produce the healthiest baby possible. when i heard this i thought, what kind of spiritual, psychological or even physical damage (think freezer-burn) might transpire? and what kind of limbo is this embryonic human enduring, frozen for years somewhere in a big city?

neva's avatar

It's very interesting to ponder the consequences on a soul level...

Usually a soul enters the human body around birth (shortly before or after). One might wonder whether this being will have a soul or not (many on Earth don't have one, they are the real "NPC's").

And if it does then why would that soul choose a vessel that has been frozen?

We make soul agreements/contracts prior to our birth (when we plan our next life) so regardless of what will take place it has been agreed upon. Which doesn't necessarily mean it will be an easy ride...

Joe Bruno's avatar

Wow, you actually know when the soul enters the body! Hokus-pokus-surely-you-jokus.

neva's avatar

Well, there's a lot of information available if you care to look for it.

Joe Bruno's avatar

Yes. I suppose that’s so.