The mirror metaphor is especially powerful. It reveals the deep illusion of the ego — how it clings to reflection, mistaking one's inverted image for their essence. The mirror only shows what the body rejects; so too, ego defines us by what we are not. In a world driven by mechanistic ideals — where life is reduced to function and flaws are treated as errors to be erased — this inverted logic becomes normalized. But as Huxley saw, what appears worthless in the world of appearances is often most vital in the deeper reality. Flaws, lack, and imperfection are not failures of humanity; they are its very essence. To impose clinical logic on life’s creation is to reject the soul for the fragile shell — to dehumanize in pursuit of the inhuman ideal. But it is precisely in our lack that love is born, and through our limits that we become capable of the deeper meaning of love and life itself.
It truly is amazing how, if you can get a person to accept a single premise, you can add all sorts of warped, twisted, corrupted, and perverted logic to entrap, ensnare, and enslave him for the rest of his life. Take the scribblings of a random Jew several millennia ago, "You were born in sin, and you need salvation. If you don't accept this salvation, you will burn in Hell in excruciating agony for all Eternity!" Tell this egregious lie to a child, he accepts it, and you've entrapped, ensnared, and enslaved him for the rest of his life. He grows older, tells this same lie to his children, and after a couple of millennia, you've got the whole Western civilization entrapped, ensnared, and enslaved. They are now all putty in your hands and you can guide them like Zombies to do your will, as is happening today.
"Stalin and Hitler both knew: it’s about ruthlessly imposing your logic." The difference between Stalin and Hitler is that Stalin was fighting to create the Jewish communist world we find ourselves in today. Hitler and the Germans fought to the death for Western Nature based values, ways, traditions and heritage. With the help of our American ZOG, Stalin won WWII for the Jews, and we have their boots in our faces today. Not yet as bad as the poor Palestinians in Gaza do, but it's coming. Karl Marx didn't even really have to write his Communist Manifesto, as it's all out front and center in that Magnum Opus of Middle Eastern psychopathy, the Abrahamic/Jewish Holy Bible. It befuddles me to discombobulation that so very few see how tyrannical and communist that Wholly Black Book is.
It reminds me of the 1984 film. There is a scene where scienctist announced the ability to abolish the orgasm. (To abolish the primal ways of thinking that lead to a familystructure etc). After that you hear an anouncement that plenty of woman have already voluntarily signed up for artificial incimination.
But already today the proces of creating new life has become (partly) mechanical. There are many cases where the parents choose for an abortion if the early pregnancy tests show a high probability of down syndrom for example. This is from a thought that we want the best for the future. But I think there is an underlying premise that is saying that it is better to not exist than to live a life where you are suffering (far away from the ideal image). If you are not living like the ideal image you might as wel not live.
Very helpful read. Articulates that flawed logic in the wrong hands (arrogant academics) can lead to disastrous results.
In my community over a thousand health care workers fired for vaccine hesitancy in 2021 in spite of having been exposed for over a year to Covid using the false logic that vaccination would stop the spread. A complete denial of natural immunity.
It’s hard to even imagine this scenario. A child created because of love between a man and a woman is most desired because that love is expressed by the existence of the child.
Couple quick points. Biology already has exquisite ways to allow the strongest sperm to get the gold - the thought that we can do better without wreaking havok is pure hubris.
Also, loved the comments about the flaws in humans sometimes being their most endearing elements, in a very spiritual sense. Like the indigenous basket weavers or pottery creaters who purposefully leave a stitch off, or allow a line break, declaring, "we do this because that's where the God comes in".
I guess I also have to add that I haven't known a family who had a member of their family with Down Syndrome who didn't feel their lives were made better by the beautiful souls they were - even accounting for any of the difficulties the family faced in the process
Thank you for this profound essay, as other readers pointed out. My comment:
Under the guise of the desire for a perfectly healthy baby, isn't this pure eugenics? Candidates with undesirable genes are to be eliminated. But who decides what is undesirable?
Isn't it eugenics the project of this "non-elite", supported by all the little demons of this world, for whom the populace is mainly made up of parasitic cockroaches to be eliminated.
They are people who have made the choice to love themselves, to love their own Self, in contempt of the other. I think that it is the lack of love for the Other that is the disease of our time.
By the way Joe Dispenza is on his way to make epigenetics mainstream. Genetic conditions can be changed once we have access to the quantum field, which allows for new choices, beyond any probability.
You should really reconsider your terminology. The way you use the words rational and logic leads to a lot of misunderstanding. There is nothing rational or logic in the way these people act, who want to force vaccines or in-vitro reproduction on us. Their argumentation isn't rational either. It's pseudo-rational, it's fake rationality disguising the commercial or totalitarian intentions underneath. There is absolutely nothing wrong with rationality or logic by itself. They are very fine tools, if we use them appropriately and in the appropriate context. As with the hammer, which we'd better use for nails and not for screws (or to win the debate with our neighbour), with rationality and logic it's the same. In many instances, love or intuition or instinct or even reflex is the better answer in a given life situation. All depends on the context and the goals to achieve. It's even possible that we need to learn to use several of these faculties in conjunction, in order to get the best outcomes. In this context I suggest you also to have a look at the work of Clare W. Graves and Ken Wilber who worked on the evolution of consciousness from pre-rational to rational to trans-rational.
Can you be a little bit more specific Mr. Super Teacher? In which way did I miss Desmet's point? What's the real meaning of the word logic, Master? And I'm really sorry for my pompous style. I hope I didn't offend you personally! Will I still have the right to write in English although it's not my first language?
The mirror metaphor is especially powerful. It reveals the deep illusion of the ego — how it clings to reflection, mistaking one's inverted image for their essence. The mirror only shows what the body rejects; so too, ego defines us by what we are not. In a world driven by mechanistic ideals — where life is reduced to function and flaws are treated as errors to be erased — this inverted logic becomes normalized. But as Huxley saw, what appears worthless in the world of appearances is often most vital in the deeper reality. Flaws, lack, and imperfection are not failures of humanity; they are its very essence. To impose clinical logic on life’s creation is to reject the soul for the fragile shell — to dehumanize in pursuit of the inhuman ideal. But it is precisely in our lack that love is born, and through our limits that we become capable of the deeper meaning of love and life itself.
Brilliant! Thank you.
Now... please. Anything good, beautiful, constructive. Not negative. Just once for once?
It truly is amazing how, if you can get a person to accept a single premise, you can add all sorts of warped, twisted, corrupted, and perverted logic to entrap, ensnare, and enslave him for the rest of his life. Take the scribblings of a random Jew several millennia ago, "You were born in sin, and you need salvation. If you don't accept this salvation, you will burn in Hell in excruciating agony for all Eternity!" Tell this egregious lie to a child, he accepts it, and you've entrapped, ensnared, and enslaved him for the rest of his life. He grows older, tells this same lie to his children, and after a couple of millennia, you've got the whole Western civilization entrapped, ensnared, and enslaved. They are now all putty in your hands and you can guide them like Zombies to do your will, as is happening today.
"Stalin and Hitler both knew: it’s about ruthlessly imposing your logic." The difference between Stalin and Hitler is that Stalin was fighting to create the Jewish communist world we find ourselves in today. Hitler and the Germans fought to the death for Western Nature based values, ways, traditions and heritage. With the help of our American ZOG, Stalin won WWII for the Jews, and we have their boots in our faces today. Not yet as bad as the poor Palestinians in Gaza do, but it's coming. Karl Marx didn't even really have to write his Communist Manifesto, as it's all out front and center in that Magnum Opus of Middle Eastern psychopathy, the Abrahamic/Jewish Holy Bible. It befuddles me to discombobulation that so very few see how tyrannical and communist that Wholly Black Book is.
Great work as always.
It reminds me of the 1984 film. There is a scene where scienctist announced the ability to abolish the orgasm. (To abolish the primal ways of thinking that lead to a familystructure etc). After that you hear an anouncement that plenty of woman have already voluntarily signed up for artificial incimination.
But already today the proces of creating new life has become (partly) mechanical. There are many cases where the parents choose for an abortion if the early pregnancy tests show a high probability of down syndrom for example. This is from a thought that we want the best for the future. But I think there is an underlying premise that is saying that it is better to not exist than to live a life where you are suffering (far away from the ideal image). If you are not living like the ideal image you might as wel not live.
Very helpful read. Articulates that flawed logic in the wrong hands (arrogant academics) can lead to disastrous results.
In my community over a thousand health care workers fired for vaccine hesitancy in 2021 in spite of having been exposed for over a year to Covid using the false logic that vaccination would stop the spread. A complete denial of natural immunity.
I wouldn’t want any sperm from someone who got the jab or any other useless vaccines.
We just need to wait a little more...
Soon all the problems related to reproduction will cease to exist.
The Natural Evolution
https://voza0db.substack.com/p/morons-just-dont-get-it-2e3
Be patient. We'll make it work.
It’s hard to even imagine this scenario. A child created because of love between a man and a woman is most desired because that love is expressed by the existence of the child.
Couple quick points. Biology already has exquisite ways to allow the strongest sperm to get the gold - the thought that we can do better without wreaking havok is pure hubris.
Also, loved the comments about the flaws in humans sometimes being their most endearing elements, in a very spiritual sense. Like the indigenous basket weavers or pottery creaters who purposefully leave a stitch off, or allow a line break, declaring, "we do this because that's where the God comes in".
I guess I also have to add that I haven't known a family who had a member of their family with Down Syndrome who didn't feel their lives were made better by the beautiful souls they were - even accounting for any of the difficulties the family faced in the process
Thank you for this profound essay, as other readers pointed out. My comment:
Under the guise of the desire for a perfectly healthy baby, isn't this pure eugenics? Candidates with undesirable genes are to be eliminated. But who decides what is undesirable?
Isn't it eugenics the project of this "non-elite", supported by all the little demons of this world, for whom the populace is mainly made up of parasitic cockroaches to be eliminated.
They are people who have made the choice to love themselves, to love their own Self, in contempt of the other. I think that it is the lack of love for the Other that is the disease of our time.
By the way Joe Dispenza is on his way to make epigenetics mainstream. Genetic conditions can be changed once we have access to the quantum field, which allows for new choices, beyond any probability.
Everything that is scarce is costly, a 5$ horse is rare, it is therefore costly…
You should really reconsider your terminology. The way you use the words rational and logic leads to a lot of misunderstanding. There is nothing rational or logic in the way these people act, who want to force vaccines or in-vitro reproduction on us. Their argumentation isn't rational either. It's pseudo-rational, it's fake rationality disguising the commercial or totalitarian intentions underneath. There is absolutely nothing wrong with rationality or logic by itself. They are very fine tools, if we use them appropriately and in the appropriate context. As with the hammer, which we'd better use for nails and not for screws (or to win the debate with our neighbour), with rationality and logic it's the same. In many instances, love or intuition or instinct or even reflex is the better answer in a given life situation. All depends on the context and the goals to achieve. It's even possible that we need to learn to use several of these faculties in conjunction, in order to get the best outcomes. In this context I suggest you also to have a look at the work of Clare W. Graves and Ken Wilber who worked on the evolution of consciousness from pre-rational to rational to trans-rational.
Somehow you missed Desmet's point. And you have a lot of balls starting off telling him how to express his ideas (reconsider his terminology).
Your grammar is poor, your style pompous and, lastly, you do not understand the meaning of the word logic.
Can you be a little bit more specific Mr. Super Teacher? In which way did I miss Desmet's point? What's the real meaning of the word logic, Master? And I'm really sorry for my pompous style. I hope I didn't offend you personally! Will I still have the right to write in English although it's not my first language?
If we don't want a dystopian future we'll have to embody love. It takes work and time and it starts with raising our frequency.
Agreed