I purposely skip anything to do with Epstein and his ominous files. How did one person manage to produce, collect and store 3 million pages of emails, messages etc? 3 million. And who are those riffling through this enormous stack of documents? One would prefer this be carried out carefully and attentively and preferably unbiased. But is it? I sense too much hype and cover up. It seems to be a devious attempt of that dark ruling class to throw some of their minions under the bus - those too old or too irrelevant to the cause - to shield themselves.
I think this piece offers an important insight, one that I agree with. However, I’d like to point out that when it claims someone or some group “harbors a contempt for ethics,” in actuality, that someone or group almost certainly follows a morality that is different than the writer. Those people may not share the author’s ethics but they do act according to their morality, even though it is likely to be convoluted and inconsistent, as almost all moralities are. The problem isn’t that people aren’t ethical; the problem is most do not follow a rationally-chosen, pro-human, pro-life morality. The fact that a celebrated writer doesn’t understand that is evidence that the world, generally, does not understand ethics. Think about it: how many people (outside of PhD candidates) are taught the various moralities in school and are prompted to select the one that they think is best?
My comment about this below introduces the different systems of Ethics. It is not an accident that those who embrace Utilitarian Ethics are the ones who end up with the most blood on their hands. Breaking eggs to make omelets. "Unavoidably unsafe" justification for doing harm 'greater good.' It is in those definitions of exactly what constitutes a 'greater good' that allow in subjectivity that isn't universally shared. They claim consensus determines. Which almost universally is a consensus of like-minded's. Debate-free. Utilitarian Ethics asserting a 'greater good' based on 'consensus' at a Marxist convention will look markedly different than a 'consensus' at a Libertarian convention. Utilitarianism is a license to commit great harm to the trusting innocents. "Sorry, kiddo, the gods demand you be sacrificed for the crops to grow. Step up to the altar and have your beating heart sliced out of you, the empire thanks you!" Greater good. Consensus to mass murder.
Your commentary on the Epstein files is disappointingly flat compared to most of your earlier articles. I'd say you totally missed the boat on this one. Your comments on the Church Committee are also deeply flawed as the fuller historical picture is entirely missing. Perhaps the courage and insight you so ably displayed regarding the pandemic insanity has left you bereft of further courage and insight? Your statement that,
"The elite does what the population can only fantasize about in its darkest thoughts"
is hideous beyond all telling. Such a statement is an unjust indictment of the entire human race. Do you really believe the average Joe is fantasizing about raping children and disemboweling babies? Rather than throwing all of us under the bus, how about offering some light and hope that might help us avoid and dispel the evils that threaten to enslave us?
Positive Psychology, integral psychology is the greatest servant of the capitalists and funders of the eugenics in the 20th century as the neo-eugenics aka transhumanism in the 21st century.
Trans- and Posthumanism is the new golden age standard in European Science. The reimergence of cosmology without boarders to occultism and antroposophical/theosophical world view.
Oh yeah, oh yeah, the economy of love is back and so many scientists and mangers love it.
Never thaught that psycholigist, especially integral (psycho-spiritual) psychologists and holistic health thinkers would be the first to sell their ideas to capitalists, neuroliberalists, bioeconomists aka the directors of the well known human zoo once again.
I admire much of your writing, but this piece is a confused and jumbled mess that ultimately becomes its own dung hill of navel-gazing and false equivalences.
At one point you imply that if we're not "paying double" for organic food we're more or less the same as people who have kidnapped, tortured, and raped children.
Please, the times call for more moral courage than this. We need better ethics and moral clarity.
Or perhaps you are deliberately writing to numb us, to deaden our outrage, and to force false equivalences into our minds?
You're a great writer, but having read this, I imagine that if you were walking in a public park and you spotted a man about to murder someone, rather than intervene, you would stop, stare into the ground, and contemplate "well I too have darkness in my heart; who am I to intervene? who am I to judge? perhaps I too will someday be a murderer."
Without Epsteins fundings at Harvard and the Santa Fe-Institute this “The” Science the reemergence of the universal and unifying science would not have been so successful.
This is much more about “complicated” connections between science and journalism as scientific america is reporting.
MEHA-movement has no distance to this “humanity 2.0”, “enlightment 2.0” which is driven by Vatican and Silicon Valley and the capitalists of the 20th century who was funding the science of eugenics in the 18./19. century as they do it since 1998.
I find it fascinating as well as synchronistic that I received Mattias' deep flowing on this issue the same day I received the following: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-infrastructure-of-impunity . If we can understand the depth of both, we will each have an opportunity to chose to be part of the awakening to create a world based on the higher ideals and truth of our Creator.
“That the banking system is perverse and transforms society into a kind of slave plantation - I agree. But how many people do you know who withdraw their money from banks and convert it into, say, physical gold and silver?”
You obviously do not know anything about money (and its main function). And in this case also not much about history. As everyone with a little knowledge about “the banking system” can see. Unfortunately you are not alone. Nearly all outer party members and especially “experts” are in the same loud shouting crowd. Conspiracies are a fact since Caesar or so. But perhaps it is not human stupidity which should never be underestimated, but overconfidence? Which like greed (and much, muuuch more than loneliness) can turn the b e s t men in town suddenly into outspoken vampires.
"Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell recruited girls as young as fourteen under the guise of “massages” that led to sexual abuse. They threatened them, confiscated passports, and coerced them into sexual acts. This is not about one or a few cases; it concerns hundreds of victims. "
Um this is not what happened. FFS. It is what is claimed to have happened (sortof) but there's essentially little to not evidence of this happening.
If you go back to the 2005 investigation into Epstein and 2008 conviction of Epstein, Maxwell was no longer "with him" except as a property manager for his company. The person recruiting girls as young as 14 (I believe there was only one instance of this), was Haley Robson, who is currently (somehow) being paraded around as a "victim." In fact, Haley Robson was arrested for sex trafficking. Law enforcement did not investigate Maxwell at all in '05-'08 as they saw no reason to. They dropped pressing charges on Haley Robson for "trafficking" for reasons unknown, perhaps because she was just a dumb 18-19 y/o and they didn't want to ruin her life. In recorded depositions with the "victims" (nearly all of whom were over the age of 18), they revealed Haley Robson told any high school students she recruited to lie and tell Epstein they were over the age of 18 because he didn't like underaged girls. He barely ever had sex with any of them, because he had a heart problem (according to Ghislaine) and had difficulty "performing", so instead he preferred to get a massage from topless women while he masturbated.
He had intercourse with one of these young women the day before her 18th birthday. That would be legal virtually everywhere in the civilized world, but in Florida the age of consent is 18, so that was his conviction.
Skeezy, yes, massive trafficking operation, no.
That's it. That's the entire thing.
Then Virginia Giuffre, Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer, Nick Bryant, Whitney Webb, and the TrueAnon podcast ran around "making stuff up." Of course maybe some of the allegations are true, maybe Bill Clinton eats babies in Thailand on a regular basis, who knows. But the evidence as presented does not substantiate most of the outlandish claims being thrown around willy nilly.
When Maxwell was convicted in 2021, an example of the sexual abuse the government claimed demonstrated evidence of underaged "sex trafficking" and "sexual assault" was that Annie Farmer held Jeffrey Epstein's hand during a movie. No I'm not joking.
This is just like all the other operations and it’s only touching a very small surface. Most of the documents are either redacted or not made available to the public. This is an insurance policy that protects certain policies made either in the Senate or parliament and every five Country in particular can and will be enforced for the benefit of Israel. Do you agree with that at least? The Franklin scandal in the 80s ended up uncovering not just sex trafficking directly in the Whitehouse and compromising of senators but also the Iran-Contra scandal . The recent Puff Daddy scandal is exactly the same operation as the Epstein operation? Or do you disagree? It’s quite simple these are insurance policies that have been going on for a long time to ensure that every politician or person of influence is compromised or comprisable
It’s just a completely made up story that is not corroborated by anything, not court transcripts, victim statements, nothing. “John Wayne Gacy John Norman” or “Marc Dutroux” are better - corroborated - examples of what you are looking for.
There is so much here and has been for decades. It's finally, barely, trickling out.
These people who want to minimize these revelations strike me as strange, likely bots or receiving funds from "a middle east country." Or perhaps it's just too much for them to consider that something this evil and rotten could be happening.
This is probably what I don’t agree with. There is something very different about people that completely sell themselves out and treat others and the world around them as something to step on.
I purposely skip anything to do with Epstein and his ominous files. How did one person manage to produce, collect and store 3 million pages of emails, messages etc? 3 million. And who are those riffling through this enormous stack of documents? One would prefer this be carried out carefully and attentively and preferably unbiased. But is it? I sense too much hype and cover up. It seems to be a devious attempt of that dark ruling class to throw some of their minions under the bus - those too old or too irrelevant to the cause - to shield themselves.
"Totalitarian structures extract love from human bonds."
The painfulness ... and truth of this hits hard...
I am devastation : I am unloved
I think this piece offers an important insight, one that I agree with. However, I’d like to point out that when it claims someone or some group “harbors a contempt for ethics,” in actuality, that someone or group almost certainly follows a morality that is different than the writer. Those people may not share the author’s ethics but they do act according to their morality, even though it is likely to be convoluted and inconsistent, as almost all moralities are. The problem isn’t that people aren’t ethical; the problem is most do not follow a rationally-chosen, pro-human, pro-life morality. The fact that a celebrated writer doesn’t understand that is evidence that the world, generally, does not understand ethics. Think about it: how many people (outside of PhD candidates) are taught the various moralities in school and are prompted to select the one that they think is best?
My comment about this below introduces the different systems of Ethics. It is not an accident that those who embrace Utilitarian Ethics are the ones who end up with the most blood on their hands. Breaking eggs to make omelets. "Unavoidably unsafe" justification for doing harm 'greater good.' It is in those definitions of exactly what constitutes a 'greater good' that allow in subjectivity that isn't universally shared. They claim consensus determines. Which almost universally is a consensus of like-minded's. Debate-free. Utilitarian Ethics asserting a 'greater good' based on 'consensus' at a Marxist convention will look markedly different than a 'consensus' at a Libertarian convention. Utilitarianism is a license to commit great harm to the trusting innocents. "Sorry, kiddo, the gods demand you be sacrificed for the crops to grow. Step up to the altar and have your beating heart sliced out of you, the empire thanks you!" Greater good. Consensus to mass murder.
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/consensus
Your commentary on the Epstein files is disappointingly flat compared to most of your earlier articles. I'd say you totally missed the boat on this one. Your comments on the Church Committee are also deeply flawed as the fuller historical picture is entirely missing. Perhaps the courage and insight you so ably displayed regarding the pandemic insanity has left you bereft of further courage and insight? Your statement that,
"The elite does what the population can only fantasize about in its darkest thoughts"
is hideous beyond all telling. Such a statement is an unjust indictment of the entire human race. Do you really believe the average Joe is fantasizing about raping children and disemboweling babies? Rather than throwing all of us under the bus, how about offering some light and hope that might help us avoid and dispel the evils that threaten to enslave us?
A better servant for the continuity of capitalism psychologists could not have served
“We want to prevent, but we cause what we want to prevent” is the most not understood principle of this reemergence of life philosophy.
The planetary management of this spaceship earth arrived in 2019.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000057266
Positive Psychology, integral psychology is the greatest servant of the capitalists and funders of the eugenics in the 20th century as the neo-eugenics aka transhumanism in the 21st century.
Trans- and Posthumanism is the new golden age standard in European Science. The reimergence of cosmology without boarders to occultism and antroposophical/theosophical world view.
Oh yeah, oh yeah, the economy of love is back and so many scientists and mangers love it.
The economy of love. https://dasgoetheanum.com/oekonomie-der-liebe/
Never thaught that psycholigist, especially integral (psycho-spiritual) psychologists and holistic health thinkers would be the first to sell their ideas to capitalists, neuroliberalists, bioeconomists aka the directors of the well known human zoo once again.
I admire much of your writing, but this piece is a confused and jumbled mess that ultimately becomes its own dung hill of navel-gazing and false equivalences.
At one point you imply that if we're not "paying double" for organic food we're more or less the same as people who have kidnapped, tortured, and raped children.
Please, the times call for more moral courage than this. We need better ethics and moral clarity.
Or perhaps you are deliberately writing to numb us, to deaden our outrage, and to force false equivalences into our minds?
You're a great writer, but having read this, I imagine that if you were walking in a public park and you spotted a man about to murder someone, rather than intervene, you would stop, stare into the ground, and contemplate "well I too have darkness in my heart; who am I to intervene? who am I to judge? perhaps I too will someday be a murderer."
All evil needs is for good people to do nothing.
Since 1996 all scientists, all so called “lefties” could have said: no, no, no, no. We do that not once again.
Putting oil and gas out of economic growth and putting holisitic health as factor of economic growth in.
https://www.sociostudies.org/almanac/articles/the_sixth_kondratieff/
Too much scientists, esprecially psychologist who did’nt learned the conclusion of the totalitarisms of the 20st century.
Never find a distance to the continuity of eugenic thinking through the Human Potential Movement in California.
Without Epsteins fundings at Harvard and the Santa Fe-Institute this “The” Science the reemergence of the universal and unifying science would not have been so successful.
This is much more about “complicated” connections between science and journalism as scientific america is reporting.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/epstein-files-show-a-complicated-relationship-with-science-and-journalism/
But the main question is: Why is MEHA supporting this since it’s founding?
MEHA-movement has no distance to this “humanity 2.0”, “enlightment 2.0” which is driven by Vatican and Silicon Valley and the capitalists of the 20th century who was funding the science of eugenics in the 18./19. century as they do it since 1998.
I find it fascinating as well as synchronistic that I received Mattias' deep flowing on this issue the same day I received the following: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-infrastructure-of-impunity . If we can understand the depth of both, we will each have an opportunity to chose to be part of the awakening to create a world based on the higher ideals and truth of our Creator.
Social conduct being a product of the human psyche... Excellent observation!
Would you please send out an announcement of your book's presale availability?
A French translation: https://dieudonnedard.substack.com/p/les-dossiers-epstein-et-les-limites
Maybe I missed it: what does Mattias concretely suggest that I should do about "this, that, and the other"?
“That the banking system is perverse and transforms society into a kind of slave plantation - I agree. But how many people do you know who withdraw their money from banks and convert it into, say, physical gold and silver?”
You obviously do not know anything about money (and its main function). And in this case also not much about history. As everyone with a little knowledge about “the banking system” can see. Unfortunately you are not alone. Nearly all outer party members and especially “experts” are in the same loud shouting crowd. Conspiracies are a fact since Caesar or so. But perhaps it is not human stupidity which should never be underestimated, but overconfidence? Which like greed (and much, muuuch more than loneliness) can turn the b e s t men in town suddenly into outspoken vampires.
"Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell recruited girls as young as fourteen under the guise of “massages” that led to sexual abuse. They threatened them, confiscated passports, and coerced them into sexual acts. This is not about one or a few cases; it concerns hundreds of victims. "
Um this is not what happened. FFS. It is what is claimed to have happened (sortof) but there's essentially little to not evidence of this happening.
If you go back to the 2005 investigation into Epstein and 2008 conviction of Epstein, Maxwell was no longer "with him" except as a property manager for his company. The person recruiting girls as young as 14 (I believe there was only one instance of this), was Haley Robson, who is currently (somehow) being paraded around as a "victim." In fact, Haley Robson was arrested for sex trafficking. Law enforcement did not investigate Maxwell at all in '05-'08 as they saw no reason to. They dropped pressing charges on Haley Robson for "trafficking" for reasons unknown, perhaps because she was just a dumb 18-19 y/o and they didn't want to ruin her life. In recorded depositions with the "victims" (nearly all of whom were over the age of 18), they revealed Haley Robson told any high school students she recruited to lie and tell Epstein they were over the age of 18 because he didn't like underaged girls. He barely ever had sex with any of them, because he had a heart problem (according to Ghislaine) and had difficulty "performing", so instead he preferred to get a massage from topless women while he masturbated.
He had intercourse with one of these young women the day before her 18th birthday. That would be legal virtually everywhere in the civilized world, but in Florida the age of consent is 18, so that was his conviction.
Skeezy, yes, massive trafficking operation, no.
That's it. That's the entire thing.
Then Virginia Giuffre, Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer, Nick Bryant, Whitney Webb, and the TrueAnon podcast ran around "making stuff up." Of course maybe some of the allegations are true, maybe Bill Clinton eats babies in Thailand on a regular basis, who knows. But the evidence as presented does not substantiate most of the outlandish claims being thrown around willy nilly.
When Maxwell was convicted in 2021, an example of the sexual abuse the government claimed demonstrated evidence of underaged "sex trafficking" and "sexual assault" was that Annie Farmer held Jeffrey Epstein's hand during a movie. No I'm not joking.
This is just like all the other operations and it’s only touching a very small surface. Most of the documents are either redacted or not made available to the public. This is an insurance policy that protects certain policies made either in the Senate or parliament and every five Country in particular can and will be enforced for the benefit of Israel. Do you agree with that at least? The Franklin scandal in the 80s ended up uncovering not just sex trafficking directly in the Whitehouse and compromising of senators but also the Iran-Contra scandal . The recent Puff Daddy scandal is exactly the same operation as the Epstein operation? Or do you disagree? It’s quite simple these are insurance policies that have been going on for a long time to ensure that every politician or person of influence is compromised or comprisable
It’s just a completely made up story that is not corroborated by anything, not court transcripts, victim statements, nothing. “John Wayne Gacy John Norman” or “Marc Dutroux” are better - corroborated - examples of what you are looking for.
Well said.
There is so much here and has been for decades. It's finally, barely, trickling out.
These people who want to minimize these revelations strike me as strange, likely bots or receiving funds from "a middle east country." Or perhaps it's just too much for them to consider that something this evil and rotten could be happening.
dank!
Great line! The elite does what the population can only fantasize about in its darkest thoughts.
This is probably what I don’t agree with. There is something very different about people that completely sell themselves out and treat others and the world around them as something to step on.