The issue with Malone is not with the "masses".. The issue is that other scientists, doctors are not to question his views or they will be sued in millions. There are a lot of suspicious questions - why did he claim that he had taken the jab when he is saying that mRNA technology is dangerous and has a connection to transhumanism? Why is…
The issue with Malone is not with the "masses".. The issue is that other scientists, doctors are not to question his views or they will be sued in millions. There are a lot of suspicious questions - why did he claim that he had taken the jab when he is saying that mRNA technology is dangerous and has a connection to transhumanism? Why is he saying Karen Kingston is a troll when she is reading the patents from Moderna and Pfizer? She was asked not to present her research. Many more issues and questions.
At the point, it probably does not matter if it is mass formation or some other phenomena, people were lied to, manipulated and took advantage of. We need to help each other heal, detox from the jab and its shedding and bring those who conducted it to justice.
The first time i came across Malone he had joined a roundtable discussion about the jab risks and potential… i think Geert Vanden Bossche was participating… it was a classic old school scientific debate where each specialist shared their wisdom and gave their viewpoint and wrestled with likely scenarios resulting from the jab. At no time did Malone dismiss the other participants, he appeared to be open to taking onboard what they were saying and was always respectful and erudite. Gradually as all subsequent opportunities for scientific debate brought new awareness his position shifted and adapted after weighing up the evidences. He has a remarkable intellect and a world-class ability to think before he speaks.
"claim that he had taken the jab when he is saying that mRNA technology is dangerous and has a connection to transhumanism" - My take: He thought he could trust the people in the NIH, as many of us did because the data were hidden away. The data began to leak. He researched the data, as many did. We refused the boosters despite being "at risk". Malone dug deeper than most of us and became a warrior. He, like all of us, is not perfect thus can have emotions and be wrong. So it is.
Our trust has been poorly abused, we agree. Malone's notion of 5th Gen Warfare seems accurate as we await his book. Those powerful tools have been abused to create the topic mass formation [hysteria- my thought].
The issue with Malone is not with the "masses".. The issue is that other scientists, doctors are not to question his views or they will be sued in millions. There are a lot of suspicious questions - why did he claim that he had taken the jab when he is saying that mRNA technology is dangerous and has a connection to transhumanism? Why is he saying Karen Kingston is a troll when she is reading the patents from Moderna and Pfizer? She was asked not to present her research. Many more issues and questions.
At the point, it probably does not matter if it is mass formation or some other phenomena, people were lied to, manipulated and took advantage of. We need to help each other heal, detox from the jab and its shedding and bring those who conducted it to justice.
The first time i came across Malone he had joined a roundtable discussion about the jab risks and potential… i think Geert Vanden Bossche was participating… it was a classic old school scientific debate where each specialist shared their wisdom and gave their viewpoint and wrestled with likely scenarios resulting from the jab. At no time did Malone dismiss the other participants, he appeared to be open to taking onboard what they were saying and was always respectful and erudite. Gradually as all subsequent opportunities for scientific debate brought new awareness his position shifted and adapted after weighing up the evidences. He has a remarkable intellect and a world-class ability to think before he speaks.
"claim that he had taken the jab when he is saying that mRNA technology is dangerous and has a connection to transhumanism" - My take: He thought he could trust the people in the NIH, as many of us did because the data were hidden away. The data began to leak. He researched the data, as many did. We refused the boosters despite being "at risk". Malone dug deeper than most of us and became a warrior. He, like all of us, is not perfect thus can have emotions and be wrong. So it is.
Our trust has been poorly abused, we agree. Malone's notion of 5th Gen Warfare seems accurate as we await his book. Those powerful tools have been abused to create the topic mass formation [hysteria- my thought].
Heresay and gossip. Shame.