408 Comments

I grew up in an ultra orthodox family and community. It was instilled at a very young age and throughout my life (and BTW the actually meaning is repair the WORLD not yourself- that would just be TIKUN to repair the same way you repair a car) Why do you think Jews have always be in the forefront on innovation and technology? It's embedded into our DNA. Believe me, I am as far right as a Jew can be, I've never been a leftist! Am Israel Chai

Expand full comment

Very disappointed by this very conservative essay. I am surprise that a thinker like you who took an unpopular stance during the pandemic can totally overlook the killing of children, women , elderly , sick people by a western power backed by imperialist powers and overlook as well the events since 1948 that led to the creation of the open air prison camp of Gaza and the apartheid state. I am surprised , as a friend of mine remarked that you did not discern that Zionism is a mass formation psychosis. I will not read you anymore and neither recommend any of your works.

Expand full comment

This is a most pathetic example of how humans, especially the "educated" who spend their lives in thier own heads, can come up with ideas about reality and then be completely in denial about them.

The writer is obviously an imbecile or has someone turning the thumbscrews on him so that he ignores the holocaust of Palestinians that's being done by Israel and largely supported by Jewish people everywhere, and by the entirety of Western civilisation. And by the majority of industrial civilisation, if you want a broad view.

Mr Desmet apparently has such a narrow view he can't even apply his own theory to himself. A complete waste of space.

Expand full comment

They are not pro-Palestinian marches - this is how the press labels them. The marches are for a ceasefire in Gaza and a free Palestine (equal rights for Palestinians who live in what is known legally as the Occupied Territories). This would lead to less deaths of Palestinians and the release of Israeli hostages. Thousands of Jewish people march, speak and support these rallies - horrified that 'Israel' behaves like those who oppressed Jews in WWII (their words, not mine).

Palestine was given by the British Empire in 1917 to what was effectively a Zionist movement they helped nurture. It had nothing to do with WWII. And it had nothing to do with a Homeland for Jews. This was the selling point which hid something darker. Both Churchill (in charge of the mid-east at the time) and Balfour were raging antisemites and saw Palestine as a way to rid Europe of Jews and not to lose land advantage following the Sykes-Picot Agreement. This is documented. The British Empire used the Zionist movement, which in turn used a modern (1800s) narrative that the Jews from Europe were the chosen people. They were chosen - not by God - but by the British Empire to act as human shields for the colonial expansionist project. This expansionism for Western interests has continued under the US hegemon. As RFK Jr says 'Israel is useful to us...like having an aircraft carrier in the mid-east'.

Hamas' aim is not to kill Jews. These are lazy tropes regurgitated daily by MSM and pro-Israel lobby groups. As the 2017 Hamas Covenant says: 'Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.'

This is exactly the point. Israel isn't about Jews or Judaism. How could anybody be safe in a land stolen by the British Empire and surrounded by the very refugees created by the theft? How could anybody be safe building their houses on the razed villages of dead Arabs, while their relatives watched from a few miles away? It was a lie and a cruel trick played on Jewish people so desperate for safety following the atrocities of WWII.

As for a 'deserved' homeland - what use is that if it merely transfers the loss, expulsions and ethnic cleansing the Jews suffered, onto the Palestinians. It's still the same problem. Nothing has been solved.

You may wish to read further on the unfolding of events on October 7th 2023 from witness statements on the ground (October7.org) to the actions of the IDF. I know someone who used to live in Kibbutz Be'eri who confirmed that IDF tanks fired into kibbutz buildings. This has been reported in both Haaretz and the Times of Israel. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-07-07/ty-article-magazine/.premium/idf-ordered-hannibal-directive-on-october-7-to-prevent-hamas-taking-soldiers-captive/00000190-89a2-d776-a3b1-fdbe45520000

As for taking one side or the other. If this was WWII and there was mobile phone footage broadcast live from the camps, we'd also be out on the streets. But it is happening now to the Palestinians. Hence the protest focusing mainly on Gaza, the West Bank and freedom & equality for Palestinians.

The Arabs and Jews have something in common. They were both lied to by the British Empire. The Arabs (as the British colonists referred to the Palestinians) were told they could have the land if they helped the British rid the place of the Ottomans. The European Jews were told they hailed from the Levant, whereas both Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews (who make up 95% of the Israeli Jewish population) are predominantly European according to their DNA.

Antisemitism has been used to prevent a deep-dive into the real reasons for the creation of a 'bulwark' (RFK Jr again) in the middle East created to serve the interests of the Anglo-colonial and later Anglo-US Empire. If people knew the truth and how and why they've been lied to, they may not be as keen to defend what is effectively an Anglo-US colony that cares little for the safety of Jews & Palestinians.

Expand full comment

good nuanced points. Thanks. One thing I must note is that the state of Israel was not founded because of the holocaust. You wrote:

" the cause of the Arab countries' invasion was the colonialist founding of the state of Israel by the United Nations, the cause of that founding was the Holocaust, and so on. "

I really must stress this as it's commonly misunderstood. Zionism (a Jewish nationalist movement which sought a homeland for European jews), whose ideology was finally realized in the founding of Israel, was first being spoken of in Jewish European circles in the 1880's. Theodor Hertlz being the central figure. European Jews took themselves to Palestine as early as the late 1800s, into the early 1900s (google first and 2nd Aliyah). the first Zionist congress took place in 1886- there the drafts for jewish national homeland with international support took place. in 1901 , the Jewish National Fund was established, tasked with buying land in Palestine. Strategic patches of Zionist Jewish settlement propped up through the early 1900s. Google the "Al-Fula Affair" of 1910 , in which land purchased by the Jewish National Fund displaced 1000 Palestinians, and caused a bloody fight between the two parties. 1917 Balfour Declaration , as commonly known, aided Zionism in legally enabling further Jewish settlement in Palestine. Between 1917 and 1948, there was much back and forth about whether this growing Zionist mission should occur. the King - Crane commission of 1918, commissioned by the U.S, found most locals opposed Zionism and thus called for a limit on Jewish immigration into Palestine. it was ignored. the 1930 Hope - Simpson Commission of Enquiry found similar discontent among Arabs. The report found Arabs peasants needed help and that Jewish immigration was again troubling. and so on and so on. 1948 the Zionist movement is successful enough to establish istself as the state of Israel. the holocaust merely meant Israel could be a safe place for European Jews to flee to after the horrors of Europe. But it played no part in the creation of Israel or the Zionist ideology whatsoever.

Expand full comment

I found this essay to be pretty even-handed, although I disagree with some of the specific points. I was relieved to not read another diatribe against Israel, as is so typical these days.

The “Palestinians” wanted control of Gaza. Israel withdrew all Jews from Gaza in 2005. What has resulted is a terrorism hotbed. Sorry, but it is impossible to live in peace with people whose only option for peace is your destruction and death.

Is anyone talking about areas A, B, and C in Judaea and Samaria? Despite my interest in Israel for many years, I only learned about these areas the other day.

It’s interesting how it is hardly mentioned that israel has been accepting as a matter of course, the lobbing of rockets into Israel from Gaza and Lebanon for years. Who has been talking about the fact that Israelis need to have “safe rooms” in their houses and other places where they can run when the alarms sound to warn of these incoming rockets?

How can people not see the evil of Hamas and the impossibility of being at peace with a terrorist organization bent on Israel’s destruction?

Many people who are “conspiracy theorists” and don’t trust the UN, the ICC, the WHO, et al, are suddenly willing to believe NWO entities when they are anti-Israel.

I could go on and on, but I will conclude with this article, written in 2005. This is the fundamental issue in this situation.

https://www.thebereancall.org/content/judgment-day-approaching?sapurl=Lys5MjZkL2xiL2xpLyt3dm44dWs4P2JyYW5kaW5nPXRydWUmZW1iZWQ9dHJ1ZSZyZWNlbnRSb3V0ZT1hcHAud2ViLWFwcC5saWJyYXJ5Lmxpc3QmcmVjZW50Um91dGVTbHVnPSUyQnd2bjh1azg=

Expand full comment

Where there is occupation, there will be resistance, just as night follows day. This is why the Jewish resistance blew up the King David Hotel - to rid the place of the British occupiers - same thing.

Expand full comment

You don't know what you are talking about, you are clueless.

We are talking about genocide by Israel. It has already killed more than 39 000 people, most of them civilians and half of them children and women.

That is called a crime against humanity.

The conspiracy theorists know perfectly well that most of the countries in the UN do not have the power they should have and that the UN has been hijacked by the US. That is why they veto anything that would stop wars and genocide.

Expand full comment

How’s the koolaid?

Expand full comment

you in America know it better: intoxicated by sugars and processed foods. And always have a crack on every street corner to finish you off.

Expand full comment

I live in the woods. No houses in sight. Off grid. Haul my water. Split my wood - sometimes with a gas-powered splitter, but last year, I split all 5+ cords by myself with a maul. Stacked it, hauled it in. I’m no sissy. Not all Americans are the type that I’m ashamed of being associated with, but I AM ashamed of this country and my “fellow”-Americans. Most of them, at least. They have no clue about what real life is like in their sterile houses and offices. I have made almost every bookcase and trunk and kitchen shelf in my cabin with hand tools. I eat organic food. Almost 100% of the meat I eat is what I have raised (chickens, cows, sheep). I quit processed white sugar in 1996 and eat honey and maple syrup (often homemade). I have never done drugs. I’ve never even drunk alcohol. So be careful about assuming too much just because of the country of one’s birth.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 25
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I read some. I read enough.

Did you read the article I linked above?

Expand full comment

Additional recommended reading for Mattias Desmet: https://rightsforum.org/opinie/uit-het-draaiboek-van-europa/

Expand full comment

It’s about controlling the price of energy worldwide “oil”. One of the most abundant resources labeled “fossil fuels.” We’re being played by fascist psychopaths working for central bankers. All the world’s a stage. War is about natural resources. Religions are for manipulations like media. Jews have very little Hebrew in their DNA. I wish I had a “promise land” or was “chosen”, but those beliefs were conjured up by scribes working for Kings. There is Truth in the Great Religions but the institutions have been hijacked by psychopaths.

Expand full comment

"Britain's - and later America's- drive to conquest was foreshadowed unmistakably by Mackinder's cursory yet almost oracular mention of the several bridgeheads that the Sea Powers need to graft unto the heartland to draw out its armies in a deliberate sequence of separate clashes. To isolate each conflict, the targeted territorial portion had to be severed from its adjacent district, and bled white by prolonged strife waged in the name of political, religious, or ethnic diversity. Thus the Anglo-Americans have always acted: in Europe by spinning everybody against Germany (1904-45); in the Near East, by jamming Israel in the heart of the Arab world (1917-present); in the Far East, by planting thorns in the side of China: Korea, Vietnam, and Taiwan (1950-present); in Central Asia by destabilizing the entire region into tribal warfare with the help of Pakistan to prevent the Caspian seaboard from gravitating into the Russian sphere of influence (1979-present).

... Imperial stratagems are protracted affairs. The captains of world aggression measure their achievements, or failures, on a timescale whose unit is the generation. -- Guido Preparata, Conjuring Hitler, pg. 16

Expand full comment

"Scientists at Tel Aviv University's School of Plant Sciences announced these days that they have recorded with special ultrasonic-sensitive microphones the cries of pain that plants emit when they are cut or when they lack water. There are no microphones in Gaza."

Oct. 30, 2023

Giorgio Agamben

Expand full comment

So typical how all these anti-flu protesters suddenly lost the ability to judge right after 7 October! Mattias Desmet, you may think that you’re an original independent thinker, but you’re actually very very typical, look at the examples that I gave in this opinion piece that I wrote last October, you fit in 100%

https://marjoleinvanpagee.substack.com/p/geen-oordeel-vellen-houdt-onrecht (In Dutch)

Expand full comment

We definitely need to take a stance, but neutrality is also a stance that is not allowed in highly polarised times. But more important than taking a stand is something else: saying what the reality of the situation is.

The danger of losing friends and making new friends in chaotic times is that the new transfer (a psychoanalytical concept) clouds our minds.

Desmet may be losing himself in this - among anticovid friends there are also tacit supporters of genocide. But maybe it's not just that: I think he wants to reformulate the problem in a different way, but I don't know if he realises the danger of doing so - because he is rapidly drifting away from the truth of the problem.

So he misses the mark twice:

- he has lost resonant contact with the civilian victims of Israel's systematic genocide

- he has not engaged in serious historical analysis, only clichés such as 'Human, all too human', he could have said 'Homo homini lupus'.

Expand full comment

And you know, in my opinion, it all comes down to a lack of understanding colonialism as a system of oppression. Zionism is a political and ideological branch of the Western colonial empire. Without Western/colonial support, Zionism would be dead. That’s why I ironically speak of the ‘anti-flu movement’ to express my disappointment, it’s not a movement of resistance, it’s just a bunch of white people crying that the empire hurt them too. This selective outrage is not only illustrative for the very Eurocentric (and often openly colonial!) world view within these circles, it also prevents to connect some important dots.

Expand full comment

Okay, I got it. That's partly true. As I follow critical theory and philosophy, it may be quite true that Anti-colonial thought is probably the last critical position today.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 21Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Are you Mattias’ personal assistant? The moral police of his comment section? Dictating others on how we should respond? Or are you Mattias himself?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 22
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Sorry your convoluted way of arguing makes it very tiring to continue the conversation. You keep derailing the issue and keep on defending Mattias no matter what! You may not know him personally, but he’ll be very happy with loyal supporters like you who criticize his critics but do not apply the same standards to his writings. It’s also pretty annoying how you keep on lecturing others on what appropriate is or not, meanwhile congratulating yourself with how morally superior you are. Good luck with that, I rest my case!

Expand full comment

It is remarkable how even in the political movement formed during the corona-era, venting criticisms about the pandemic narrative and, generally spoken, also not buying into the current pro Ukranian NATO-narrative, new forms of political correctness arise. This article above is a clear example of that.

Notice how this so-called movement allows itself to analyse what’s going on in Ukraine in-dept on the one hand, but hesitates to do any serious analysis of what’s happening in Gaza on the other hand. It is hard to escape the conclusion that this is due to a political choice. The reason could be that the movement mentionend consists of pro-Palestinian people, neutral people as well as (often fundamentalist christian) zionists alike while the perception prevails that the movement risks falling apart if it would delve too much into the Israeli conflict. A more personal and opportunistic reason could very well be that Desmet is using the conflict, of which he clearly has neither a relevant clue nor even the slightest grasp, to appear a bit more moderate and balanced in the eyes of his employer Ghent University while rejecting the demands for a boycott, just to compensate for his more radical years of warning for the danger of totalitarian movements and conformism during the corona-era.

However, a political movement which is neither willing nor capable of well-informed and intelligent analysis, but starts to satsify itself with romanticised bedtimefiction instead, is doomed to fade away sooner or later.

Expand full comment

that was also my point

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 21
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Apparently, you missed my third remark below in which I criticise Mr. Ely's comment and present such an analysis. It is easy to just feed people some nice sounding risk-free semi-intellectual twaddle, like Desmet does. It's less easy to properly study the historical and legal aspects of this conflict in order to develop a well-informed opinion.

Expand full comment

Postmodern praise of uncertainty and display of other forms of intellectual helplessness will undoubtedly endear some girls, especially if it happens around the campfire after a couple of Belgian beers, but in reality it amounts to a plea for disengagement and self-immobilization.

The conflict between Israel and the Palestinian population is usually associated with complexity, but much of it is merely a smokescreen in order to discourage people from investigating its cause. In this way the myth is fed to the masses of a spiral of violence without beginning or end. This myth obviously suits the strongest party in this asymmetrical power conflict, namely apartheid-state Israel, which will undoubtedly persists in the targeted bombing of Gazan civilians (by most Israeli’s blatantly called ‘seed of Amalek’), despite of that.

Unfortunately, the same can be said of Desmet's sweettalk endeavour above, which is based on this myth. In this way, Desmet himself in fact actively contributes to the dehumanization that he claims to be against.

The superficial half-baked mysticism from Desmet, which will undoubtedly cater to the masses which on average don’t like bloodshed and have no clue either, isn't based on any substantial analysis and therefore only capable of pulling the wool over our eyes once more.

Expand full comment

Your whole premise is wrong, wrong on so many levels. But the basic one is that the “Palestinian” were expelled from anywhere. I was born in British Palestine and my family was there from the early 30s. Five Arab nations in 1948 told their brethren that they were going to push the Jews into the sea, so they should flee their homes in Israel, meanwhile simultaneously expelling Jews from Arab lands. Stick to psychology and don’t pretend to be a historian.

“If the Jews laid down their arms there would be no Israel. If the Arabs laid down their arms there would be peace.”

Expand full comment

Dear genocide-apologist Ely (Eli eli lama sabachtani),

Israel has been founded on a massive campaign of ethnic cleansing, long and carefully prepared in advance by David Ben Goerion (who can be best called the Adolf Hitler for the Palestinians) and his military and orientalist advisors. The fourth and final version of that plan was called plan Dalet. This campaign is documented well, like the so called new Israeli historians found out after they got access to declassified military documents, including orders to zionist militia not to make any distinction between guilty and not guilty while assaulting and destroying Palestinian villages to speed up pressure during the expulsion-project, although Israeli society still prefers to get drunk repeatedly on bedtimestories like that the Palestinians would have left their land voluntarily.

At the moment the ethnic cleansing started, only one third of the population in British Mandate Palestine was Jewish and only 5,8% of the land was in Jewish hands. Understandably, David Ben Goerion had accepted the unfair UN partition plan in which the zionists got, despite of the situation as mentioned, most of the land (56%) assigned. However in reality David Ben Goerion still wanted to realise his initial bid to the UN, namely 80% of Palestine. Needless to say that it is hard to establish a viable Jewish democratic state (a democracy in which the zionists will have and remain having the upper hand) even in 56%, let alone 80%, of Palestine, if only one third of the population is Jewish and merely 5,8% in Jewish hands. So the campaign of ethnic cleansing was meant to solve that problem.

So under the watchful eye of the British troops which stood by idly, a sheer terrorist-campaign against Palestinians was conducted by zionist militia like the Hagana, the Irgun and the Stern. Palestinian families were often not warned in advance but simply blown up or torched while being in their houses. People trying to leave their houses in fear were randomly sprayed with stengun-bullets. Pretty-looking Palestinian girls gang-raped. Palestinian men between 10 and 50 years old caught, separated from the rest, lined up and executed on the spot, based on dubious namelists of zionist intelligence officers, just to instill fear by the other remaining Palestinians or just for having fun. Many villages were totally destroyed and mines were planted in the rubble after, just to prevent Palestinians who managed to escape from returning. This happened especially after Palestinian resistance. Other villages were left behind by Palestinians in advance, who fled in desperation after they heard of the zionist violence. These villages were looted by zionist militia, after which houses, land and other possessions were assigned to Jewish families.

Furthermore, it’s another sick zionist fairytale that little Israel has been invaded by five Arab Goliaths, after the state of Israel was declared. In reality the zionist militia had the upper hand from the beginning for several reasons.

Firstly because the backbone of the Palestinian resistance against British favoritism of zionism during the British Mandate was already effectively broken by the British army during the thirties.

Secondly, because the zionist lobby was able to get Great Brittain in check, so it wouldn’t intervene.

Thirdly, because the zionists planned the campaign of ethnic cleansing well and long in advance, gathering intelligence in a systemic way about Palestinian villages and its inhabitants (the so called village files) while building up a capable force of well-trained militiamen - especially the Palmach, a section of the Haganah.

Fourthly, because the zionists succeeded in concluding a secret deal with king Abdallah from Transjordan, who had the only capable professional Arab army (trained and led by British officers) Israel had to fear. The agreement made was that king Abadallah could get the West Bank and East Jerusalem in exchange for looking the other way while zionist forces would take the rest by force.

Fifthly, because the zionists succeeded via the zionist communist party in Palestine to secure import from superior weaponry from the Soviet Union.

Sixthly, because there was in practice an enormous gap between the retoric used by Arabic nations in public on the one hand and the invading Arab militia on the other hand. The latter often mainly consisted out of poorly trained volunteers, which were inferior in numbers to the zionist forces, besides that they got not enough and often inferior weaponry, badly organised logistic supplylines and were often led by incapable commanders with different and competing interests.

Hence, let us not mince words here. At the heart of zionism (and the conflict itself) lies the idea of Jewish supremacy. Therefore zionism considers Palestinians just as subhumans or collateral damage, during the landgrab it envisions (which encompasses in reality much more than just the territory of former British Mandate Palestine by the way), as the history of zionism, not only during the period of the establishment of Israel as a Jewish state but also thereafter clearly points out.

At the same time the west is just supposed to swallow this utter criminality in silence because of feelings of holocaustguilt or in the belief of the so called enormous complexity of this conflict, like Desmet does gullibly, skillfully manipulated to do so by the powerful zionist lobby.

Expand full comment

Description: When Israeli graduate student Teddy Katz meticulously documented a massacre of Palestinian civilians surrounding Israel's independence, he was initially celebrated for his groundbreaking work. But soon, he was stripped of his degrees and was publicly shamed as a fraudulent traitor. Decades later, incendiary new evidence emerges to corroborate Teddy's initial findings, not just vindicating him, but raising profound questions about how Israelis — and we all — deal with the darker chapters of history.

IMDb: In the war of 1948 hundreds of Palestinian villages were depopulated. Israelis call it 'The War of Independence. Palestinians call it 'Nakba"'. The film examines one village - Tantura and why "Nakba" is taboo in Israeli society.

https://archive.org/details/tantura_2022

Expand full comment

Has anything changed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECFpW5zoFXA Targeted ambulances, tortured and executed civilians. They tell me it’s “complicated."

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 21
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Israel Shahak has a book you might want to read, here: https://archive.org/details/JewishHistoryJewishReligionTheWeightOf3000Years-I.Shahak/mode/2up

I found chapter 3 and 5 most interesting.

Expand full comment

“I read your presentation, which I think is more a description of the details of the Israeli assaults and actions, than a well-argued disclosure.”

Well, maybe it's an idea to set the historical record straight first? Or are you really so naive to think that you can argue about this conflict without having any clue about that, just based on the general mood regarding the topic as perceived by yourself, supplemented with your apparent belief that history is determined by sheer contingency, plus some feelings in your underbelly?

Further, these “details” (in which you apparently fail to see any coherence or logic) show for most people, who study the matter concerned, and are not politically invested in the zionist project, a clear pattern about landgrab, apart from the fact that forced displacement qualifies as a war crime – just to mention another minor detail.

There is even resolution 194 of the General Assembly of the United Nations, which demands that Israel should let Palestinian refugees back in and compensate them fairly for loss of damage to their property, which, like may other resolutions of the General Assembly or the Security Council, Israel has never given any follow up to.

Anyhow, apart from the fact that we are just debating here in some minor comment-section on substack, it’s too easy to demand proof here like I am defending a dissertation or someone in court, while apparently you are not realising that your own assumption that the conflict can be reduced to a spiral of violence without any clear cause is equally subjected to that requirement and you are not entertaining the slightest effort to underpin this far too easy and risk-free belief.

Since you are not willing to engage seriously into this matter, I refer here only to Alan Pappé, The ethnic cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld Publications London 2006 for a good start.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 21
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

With all respect Mia, but this is a comment section, not an independent Substack post or essay as the one written by Desmet where one would expect further links to back up sweeping (and above all uninformed!) statements.

Why be so critical at someone who is just posting a comment while you seem not to have any problem with Desmet’s empty words? (Yes, that’s my opinion too, and I recommend everyone here to read the works of authors like Ilan Pappe, if you want evidence so badly, pls go check it out!)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 21Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

do not delude yourself with fairy tales about the "right starting premise" when a systematic genocide against Palestinian civilians is currently taking place.

Are you saying that you are righteous and at the same time you support genocide?

Expand full comment

Trying to maintain your Balance while sitting on The Fence certainly

is hard when so many questions threateningly unsettle you...

Expand full comment

Very well written. I was quite nervous reading this, but you did not disappoint.

However, I think people are missing an important point. For me it not about Palestinians or the Israeli state. It is about, in my opinion, a concentration camp, and a machine of death, as described in J. B. Peterson's magnum opus, the Maps of Meaning. It is this feature that has stood out to me the most. I do not look at it as a conflict, but something else. Something I worry, we do not quite understand yet. Norman Finkelstein, I believe will agree with this assessment.

Monstrosities known as concentration camps, arise again and again in modern times. I fear they are not a product of mere hatred, but some kind of undetected sadism. Like something made by the Joker in the Batman series.

I am not blaming Israeli people here. What I am referring to is something like a subtle socio-psychological process unfolding. What I want to say is, that maybe it is worth focusing on this specific aspect of the situation, how, why and under what circumstances do concentration camps come into existence?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 18
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thank you for reading my essay. I am glad you found it useful.

On your point about "masters of the world" and destruction of life, I will quote here a passage from Maps of Meaning you may find interesting: "The need for order (control, power, symmetry or homogeneity) ultimately attempts to stifle life itself.

Expand full comment