1 Comment
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Joris's avatar

I agree that just Reason alone is not enough, there much more to take into account to organize a society in the best possible way. However, according to what I know, the Enlightenment tradition did not sweep the idea of ethics as a guiding principle off the table. Rather, Enlightenment philosophers sought to establish moral principles based on reason rather than religious dogma. Some of the key developments in Enlightenment ethics include for example:

- Immanuel Kant's emphasis on duty and universal moral laws, such as the categorical imperative to "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law". Kant argued that moral actions should be guided by reason and that individuals should treat others as ends in themselves rather than mere means.

- Jeremy Bentham's philosophy of utilitarianism, which focused on maximizing happiness for the greatest number of people.

- The resurgence of virtue ethics, with thinkers like Adam Smith emphasizing character development through virtues such as prudence, justice, and benevolence.

- Mary Wollstonecraft's advocacy for gender equality and women's rights, arguing for equal opportunities for education and self-improvement.

So while Enlightenment thinkers challenged traditional notions of morality based on religious dogma, they sought to establish new ethical frameworks grounded in reason, human dignity, and the pursuit of happiness and virtue. Enlightenment ethics continue to shape modern moral discourse on human rights, social justice, and the role of character development. No?

Expand full comment